[CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60
|
04-16-18, 10:22 AM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60
Firewood,
Should all three of the gS-Series MFD's Ethernet (RayNet) sockets current be in use as you have specified, then the only option available would be to add a HS5 RayNet Network Switch to the system if it is your intention to: - share cartography between the systems - share the radar transducer between the systems - share fishfinder sonar resources between the systems - remotely control the Axiom MFD and the gS-Series MFD via the RMK-9/10 In such cases, I would typically recommend that each MFD, the Digital Radar Cable, the DSM300, and the RMK-9/10 each be interfaced to the HS5 RayNet Network Switch. If seeking a level of redundancy, then it would additionally be recommended that each MFD be interfaced as a spur to the system's powered and properly terminated SeaTalkng / NMEA 2000 backbone. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
[CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60 - Firewood - 03-14-18, 07:38 PM
RE: [CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60 - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 03-15-18, 10:08 AM
RE: [CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60 - Firewood - 03-16-18, 12:51 PM
RE: [CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60 - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 03-16-18, 01:55 PM
RE: [CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60 - Firewood - 03-16-18, 02:35 PM
RE: [CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60 - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 03-16-18, 03:59 PM
RE: [CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60 - Firewood - 03-16-18, 04:12 PM
RE: [CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60 - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 03-19-18, 08:08 AM
RE: [CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60 - Firewood - 04-14-18, 01:11 PM
RE: [CA] DSM300 B164 vs Axiom & B60 - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 04-16-18 10:22 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)