[TG] [TG11] CAM220IP compatibility with non-Raymarine MFDs
|
06-01-20, 01:42 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-01-20 01:44 AM by Tom - Raymarine - Moderator.)
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [TG11] CAM220IP compatibility with non-Raymarine MFDs
Hello kias,
Network video compatibility isn't a simple subject: there are actually several different protocols involved in announcing the device on the network (e.g. ONVIF), setting up the stream (e.g. RTSP), encapsulating video data within network packets (e.g. RTP over UDP) and the video itself (e.g. h264, 720p at 30fps.) FLIR thermal cameras largely adhere to ONVIF Profile S for interoperability with as wide a range of systems as possible, but the CAM210 and CAM220 were only expected to be used with Raymarine displays and quite as standardised. You can access their video streams on third-party devices, e.g. PC video players or network video recorders, using RTSP/RTP/h264 at the following URLs: Code: rtsp://your.cameras.ip.address:554/h264&basic_auth=YWRtaW64MTIzNA== Code: rtsp://your.cameras.ip.address:554/h264-2&basic_auth=YWRtaW64MTIzNA== On the AR200: SeatalkNG is NMEA2000. We use our own connectors which we believe are better, but it doesn't matter at all which connector type is used as long as the network is correctly laid out, powered and terminated. Regards, Tom Raymarine since 1999. Interests: Diagnosis of problems in sonar/fishfinders, NMEA2000, ethernet comms, autopilots, thermal cameras Location: Sydney, Australia. Please don't PM me asking for direct support, please ask a public question instead so that others can see the question and answer. Forum posts will always be answered before PM requests. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
[TG11] CAM220IP compatibility with non-Raymarine MFDs - kias - 05-26-20, 08:58 AM
RE: [TG11] CAM220IP compatibility with non-Raymarine MFDs - Tom - Raymarine - Moderator - 06-01-20 01:42 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)