Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[CA] [CA11] Wifi vs cable?
03-27-19, 12:15 PM (This post was last modified: 03-27-19 12:18 PM by Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator.)
Post: #2
RE: [CA11] Wifi vs cable?
Welcome to the Raymarine Forum Chris,

One of the major advantages of Quantum and Quantum 2 radomes is their wireless communications interface. The key to ensuring reliable wireless communications is to ensure that adequate Wi-Fi signal strength from the MFD is measured at the location where radome will be installed. It is considered to be a best installation practice that this be determined before the radome is installed. Please click here to view a FAQ addressing this subject. Should the measured Wi-Fi signal strength from the MFD be less than or close to the minimum recommended Wi-Fi signal strength, then it would be recommended the radome be cabled to the system. Weaknesses in cabled power/communications, particularly for Ethernet based communications, are uncommon unless the cables have been spliced/altered. Please click here to view a FAQ addressing this subject. If installed for wired communications, I generally recommend that a Digital Radar Extension Cable and/or Digital Radar Cable be installed rather than a Quantum Power Cable and Quantum Data Cable to avoid having to chase two cables to the radome.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
[CA11] Wifi vs cable? - holdech - 03-26-19, 11:47 AM
RE: [CA11] Wifi vs cable? - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 03-27-19 12:15 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)