Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[CA] [CA11] AR200 vs GA150
02-18-20, 11:29 AM
Post: #2
RE: [CA11] AR200 vs GA150
Welcome back to the Raymarine Forum Mig888,

It appears that the Raymarine staff to who you have spoken may have misunderstood the device which was being replaced to be a Raystar 150 GPS Sensor rather than a GA150 GPS Antenna. Should the device to have been replaced be a Raystar 150 GPS Sensor, then it would be as simple as had been specified. Unlike the GA150 GPS Antenna which features a coaxial cable and may be interfaced directly to a MFD's GA150 GPS antenna socket, the Raystar 150 GPS Sensor and AR200 Augmented Reality Sensor feature a SeaTalkng/NMEA 2000 communications interface and are as such designed be be interfaced to a spur socket via a SeaTalkng Spur Cable. The AR200 may only be calibrated by MFDs running the latest LightHouse 3 software (v3.11.42 at the time of this response). The AR200 is not designed to use the same mount or cable used by a GA150 GPS Antenna.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
[CA11] AR200 vs GA150 - Mig888 - 02-16-20, 04:39 PM
RE: [CA11] AR200 vs GA150 - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 02-18-20 11:29 AM
RE: [CA11] AR200 vs GA150 - Mig888 - 02-18-20, 01:37 PM
RE: [CA11] AR200 vs GA150 - Mig888 - 02-19-20, 01:19 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)