European Union (.eu)
United States (.com)
United Kingdom (.co.uk)
Australia (.com.au)
Denmark (.dk)
Finland (.fi)
France (.fr)
Germany (.de)
Italy (.it)
Norway (.no)
Netherlands (.nl)
Spain (.es)
Sweden (.se)
Search
Member List
Calendar
Help
Raymarine forum
/
Raymarine Forums
/
Multifunction Displays 
/
[CA] [CA11] Axiom PRO Real Vision versus CHIRP
/
[CA] [CA11] Axiom PRO Real Vision versus CHIRP
|
[CA] [CA11] Axiom PRO Real Vision versus CHIRP
|
|
07-29-19, 04:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-29-19 04:02 PM by Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator.)
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: [CA11] Axiom PRO Real Vision versus CHIRP
Welcome back to the Raymarine Forum Tony,
For your application, the 600W 50kHz/200kHz performance of the B744V should be satisfactory. The low power, high frequency CHIRP sonar imaging supported by a DownVision, CPT-S, or RealVision transducer would provide a bit more detailed image, but again, would not support the cruising application. Should you be interested in identifying underwater structures to the sides of the vessel, then you may want to consider an Axiom Pro RV MFD and a RealVision transducer. |
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
[CA11] Axiom PRO Real Vision versus CHIRP - tonyiiiafl - 07-24-19, 08:40 PM
RE: [CA11] Axiom PRO Real Vision versus CHIRP - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 07-29-19 04:02 PM
RE: [CA11] Axiom PRO Real Vision versus CHIRP - tonyiiiafl - 07-29-19, 07:43 PM
RE: [CA11] Axiom PRO Real Vision versus CHIRP - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 07-30-19, 07:39 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)