[CA] [CA11] Low, Medium or High CHIRP using Axiom Pro and RV-100 Transducer
|
06-11-18, 01:15 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [CA11] Low, Medium or High CHIRP using Axiom Pro and RV-100 Transducer
Chuck:
A couple of additional questions. 1. Is there a performance difference in the high chirp frequency between the RV-100 and the M265LH? 2. My primary concern is targeting suspended salmon from 50 feet down to 200 feet down . . . I'm assuming the High Chirp frequency is the best suited for this? Targeting lake trout on bottom is secondary. 3. Before purchasing the Axiom Pro, I was using a CP370 with an Airmar P66. It seemed to do a much better job marking suspended fish in my typical depth range than my new system does (the Axiom is great marking fish in less than 30 fow, but the fish marks are barely visible when fishing in 100 fow. I'm starting to wonder if it is primarily an issue with the cone angle being smaller with the CHIRP Transducers? Or is it that the medium CHIRP frequency would be better suited. I've played with the Axioms gain and sensitivity settings and that doesn't seem to make a difference. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
[CA11] Low, Medium or High CHIRP using Axiom Pro and RV-100 Transducer - bsikkel - 06-04-18, 12:27 PM
RE: [CA11] Low, Medium or High CHIRP using Axiom Pro and RV-100 Transducer - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 06-05-18, 03:08 PM
RE: [CA11] Low, Medium or High CHIRP using Axiom Pro and RV-100 Transducer - bsikkel - 06-06-18, 07:40 AM
RE: [CA11] Low, Medium or High CHIRP using Axiom Pro and RV-100 Transducer - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 06-06-18, 07:57 AM
RE: [CA11] Low, Medium or High CHIRP using Axiom Pro and RV-100 Transducer - bsikkel - 06-11-18 01:15 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)