Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[CA] [CA11] Wonky reports on DS500X Fish Finder
09-12-18, 07:42 AM (This post was last modified: 09-12-18 02:12 PM by Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator.)
Post: #7
RE: [CA11] Wonky reports on DS500X Fish Finder
Hi, Chuck,

A followup question:

Our unit is of questionable use, these days, as the temperature is entirely impossible, the speed very intermittent, and the depth non-digital, most of the time (graphics usually represent the essence of where we are, though).

Our failure to get accurate reports from our previous fishfinder's tri-ducer apparently weren't a problem with the sender, as replacing it with the B744 was only marginally better.

I have seen a ds400x for sale, NOS from its appearance. Will this effectively replace my unit, and if so, what significant differences are there between the two?

I use ours for depth, speed, and, if it ever actually would report accurately, water temp, isolated (we abandoned sending NMEA to the plotter) to the unit, as well as the fish images.

Thanks.

L8R

Skip
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: [CA11] Wonky reports on DS500X Fish Finder - skipgundlach - 09-12-18 07:42 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)