The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable - Line: 802 - File: showthread.php PHP 7.4.33 (Linux)
File Line Function
/showthread.php 802 errorHandler->error





Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[DG] [DG11] ST NG Backbone length versus Spur length
06-03-19, 02:02 PM (This post was last modified: 06-04-19 06:22 AM by Derek - Raymarine - Moderator.)
Post: #1
[DG11] ST NG Backbone length versus Spur length
Hi There,
I have a combined ST1 and STNG Network (see thread [CA11] ST60+, seatalk1, seatalk NG, ray55e, A70D and ST2000+ for details).

I have just about finalised the layout now but I have a question about STNG network layout that is probably best answered outside the previous thread as it is more general in nature.

My MFD (A70D) is located about 7m (as the cable runs) from the main hub of my network where the STNG/ST1 converter is located.
This distance will have to be covered either by an STNG backbone cable or an STNG spur cable.

I have two options for making this connection:
1. I can connect the MFD via a short spur line to an STNG "T" connector. then run a backbone cable over the longer distance to the Converter.
OR
2. I can run a spur all the way from the MFD to the converter,

As the MFD does not rely on the ST network for its power supply (or vice versa), I'm thinking there is no particular advantage either way but I have seen some posts about keeping spur lines short, so I thought I should check with the gurus.

Could you please advise what is the better option and why?

regards
Dave.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
[DG11] ST NG Backbone length versus Spur length - [email protected] - 06-03-19 02:02 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)