The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable - Line: 802 - File: showthread.php PHP 7.4.33 (Linux)
File Line Function
/showthread.php 802 errorHandler->error




Raymarine forum / Raymarine Forums / Fishfinders v / [CA] [CA11] CP370 Vs. E Series MFD

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[CA] [CA11] CP370 Vs. E Series MFD
08-15-19, 05:29 PM (This post was last modified: 08-22-19 10:30 AM by Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator.)
Post: #1
dacpdx Offline
Junior Member
**
 		Posts: 2
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation: 0
[CA11] CP370 Vs. E Series MFD
My recently purchased boat had had it’s electronics mostly removed prior to sale. So, I was searching for a solution to connect to the Through-Hull Transducer that was installed. I have determined this is a B744V (and the removed electronics were Raytheon, according to the tags on the cables). So it seems both the CP370 and E series MFD should be compatible with sensor.

So I purchased a used package consisting of a e7D and CP370. Now, what seems like a very basic question, but I’m unable to find a clear answer— Do I need the CP370? What is the advantage compared to the internal sonar driver in the e7D?

The cable coming out of the transducer has a plug that will mate directly to the e7D, but the connector on the CP370 is different.

Is it possible and worthwhile to procure and adapter to plug my B744V into the CP370? Or just use the e7D?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
[CA11] CP370 Vs. E Series MFD - dacpdx - 08-15-19 05:29 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Raymarine forum | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication