Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[CA] [CA11] E120w upgrade to e125 vs e127 e128
12-20-18, 02:33 PM (This post was last modified: 12-20-18 02:37 PM by Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator.)
Post: #4
RE: [CA11] E120w upgrade to e125 vs e127 e128
Jose,

Q1. I wanted to update the equipment, but the question is how I connect it, the truth is that I am not a professional, but I would like to be able to set everything up.
A1. This question was addressed in detail by the FAQ referenced within my previous response. Unfortunately, we don't have the bandwidth to produce custom diagrams for customers. However, we can comment on diagrams which are provided by customers. In summary, the eS127/eS128 MFD will be interfaced to the existing Ethernet network which includes the MFD, radome, and DSM30 by simply unplugging the SeaTalkhs Cable(s) from the interface panel on the back side of the E120W, and then connecting an A80160 SeaTalkhs (F) to SeaTalkhs (F) Adaptor between each SeaTalkhs Cable and the eS127/eS128 MFD's Ethernet NETWORK (RayNet) socket. The autopilot will be adapted to be interfaced to the eS127/eS128 MFD's SeaTalkng / NMEA 2000 communications interface via a SeaTalk to SeaTalkng Converter Kit.

Q2. As I was saying at the moment I have an E120w and I wanted to update to an Es125 or an Es127 or an Es128.
A2. Raymarine has not produced a product having the name eS125. Within the 12" eS-Series MFDs, only eS127 and eS128 MFDs were produced. These two MFDs differed only in the type of internal sonar circuitry which was included within the MFD's construction. When interfaced to external sonar modules, these MFDs will assume the fishfinding features of not only fishfinder circuitry within the MFD, but also with the external sonar module. The method of interfacing each of these MFDs is identical with regard to how they would be interfaced to the currently installed devices featuring an Ethernet communications interface (DSM30 and RD418D Radome). Additionally, the method of interfacing each of these MFDs is identical with regard to how they would be interfaced to the currently installed devices featuring an SeaTalk communications interface (S1G, ST8002, Raystar 125 GPS Sensor (assumed)).

Q3. For the Es127 and Es128, would the transducer that I have be valid? (I do not know what it is, I do not see it, but it has to be a compliant one with a DSM30)
A3. Should the DSM30 be operational, then there would be no need to remove it. It would simply be interfaced to the eS127 MFD or eS128 MFD in the manner specified for Ethernet devices within my response to Q1. The transducer (assumed to be operational) may remain interfaced to the DSM30. Should the system include the DSM30, then you may replace the E120W with either an eS127 or an eS128 MFD. However, should you elect to remove the DSM30 from the system, then it should be replaced with a CP370 ClearPulse Sonar Module or an eS127 MFD would need to be purchased. If opting to not use a DSM30 or CP370 within your system, then an eS127 MFD would need to be purchased and the currently installed transducer would need to be adapted (part #E66066) to be mated to the eS127 MFD's TRANSDUCER socket.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: [CA11] E120w upgrade to e125 vs e127 e128 - Chuck - Raymarine - Moderator - 12-20-18 02:33 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)